The Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in eBay v MercExchange (eBay) changed two centuries of historical precedent and law by severely curtailing the availability of injunctive relief in patent cases. This decision is among the top reasons why China now leads the world in 37 of 44 technologies critical to our economic and national security. Recognizing […]
Vishal Amin and the USPTO: A Threat to American Innovation
I first met Vishal Amin in October 2013. He was Representative Lamar Smith’s senior lawyer on the House Judiciary Committee driving the Innovation Act to passage. My company had just lost its investors due to the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act’s (AIA) creation of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). Back then, the PTAB was […]
The US Inventor PREVAIL Amendment Harms US Inventors
In June 2023, the Promoting and Respecting Economically Vital American Innovation Leadership (PREVAIL) Act was introduced in the Senate and the House (S.2220 and H.R.4370) to address the extraordinary cost and absurdly high patent invalidation rate of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB). The corporate lobby claims PREVAIL fixes the PTAB and its astronomical […]
Corporate Bills Handicap US Innovation
China can steal their way to technological parity with the U.S., but China cannot steal from the U.S. what it has not yet invented. So how did China take the global lead in 37 of 44 technologies critical to the economic and national security of the United States? The answer can only be that China […]
Mossoff Shows the RESTORE Act Codifies eBay Factors
An article published in Innovation Gadfly on September 10, 2024, entitled “The RESTORE Act Fails; Codifies the Effects of eBay,” explained how the RESTORE Act only shifts the burden of who has to prove that an injunction is warranted. Since RESTORE does not abrogate the eBay Factors, the eBay Factors will continue to determine the […]
The RESTORE Act Fails; Codifies the Effects of eBay
The U.S. Constitution constructs a patent as nothing but an “exclusive Right,” the very essence of a private property right. As such, for two centuries preceding 2006, over 90% of patent owners who won patent infringement cases were awarded injunctive relief. Infringers knew ahead of time that the courts would stop their infringement, which could […]
Rep. Darrell Issa Proposes Legislation Harmful to Startups and Inventors
Rep. Darrell Issa, the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee’s IP Subcommittee, recently introduced draft legislation titled the Litigation Transparency Act of 2024 (LTA). Issa knows this legislation is bad for inventors and startups because it was explained clearly to him in a hearing in his IP Subcommittee. You can read more about this hearing […]
Why Third-Party Litigation Funding Is A Misguided Focus
On June 12, 2024, the House IP Subcommittee held a hearing called The U.S. Intellectual Property System and the Impact of Litigation Financed by Third-Party Investors and Foreign Entities. The hearing was about third-party litigation funding (TPLF) related to patent litigation and the perceived national security risks of hidden hostile foreign funders. Some of the […]
Corporate Lobbyists Pushing Harmful Laws on Genuine Inventors
Fake Inventors Pushing Bad Law for Real Inventors After eleven years walking the halls of Congress, I’ve learned a few things. The most important is that more than half the members of Congress are good people who look out for their constituents. They value feedback and try to improve the lives of the people they […]